The Prophet's (s) Seating on the Throne
Dr. Gabriel F. Haddad
(Iqâd al-Nabî(s) alâ al-Arsh)
Dr. G. F. Haddad
Muhammad the Messenger of Allah (s) will be seated by His Lord on the Throne next to Him.
Whoever imagines that our Lord sits on the Throne and leaves space at His side for His Prophet to sit, has followed the Christians who hold that Isa was raised to heaven and sat next to his Father Allah (swt) is clear of the partnership they ascribe to Him!
Allah Most High said, as rendered in the translations of His meanings in the Quran (17:79):
And some part of the night awake for it, a largess for thee.
It may be that thy Lord will raise thee to a praised estate. [Pickthall]
And pray in the small watches of the morning: (it would be) an additional prayer (or spiritual profit) for thee : soon will thy Lord raise thee to a station of praise and Glory. [Yusuf Ali]
It is known that the meaning of the Exalted Station (al-maqâm al-mahmûd) mentioned in the above verse is the granting of the Major Intercession (al-shafâa al-kubrâ) to the Prophet (s) on the Day of Judgment, at which time people shall surge like the waves of the sea, each community begging its Prophet for intercession but only the Prophet (s) shall accept to undertake it, as expressed in al-Busiris poetry:
yâ akrama al-khalqi mâ lî man alûdhu bihi siwâka inda hulûli al-hâdithi al-amami
O noblest of creatures! I have none with whom to seek refuge
other than you when the Universal Event befalls.
Furthermore, Ibn Abbas explained that the formula of likelihood asâ It may be when attributed to Allah (swt), denotes certainty, as related by al-Bayhaqi and reiterated by the commentators.
However, several narrations are also adduced whereby the Exalted Station is the seating of the Prophet (s) by Allah (swt) on the Throne. The school of Imam Ahmad gave precedence to the latter view as the definitive explanation of the verse, despite the overall weakness of the narrations supporting it.
Ibn Masud (r) related that the Prophet (s) said: Verily I shall occupy the Exalted Station. It was asked: What is the Exalted Station? He said: It is on the day you will be brought barefoot, naked, and uncircumcised; the first to be given a garment will be Ibrahim, when Allah says: Cover my Close Friend. He will be presented with two soft, fine garments which he shall wear, and he will be seated opposite the Throne. Then I will be given a garment which I shall wear, after which I shall stand at the right of the Throne. Mine will be station which no one else will share. It will be the ardent desire of the first and the last to share it with me. Then a river will be caused to flow from the Kawthar to my Pond.
It is narrated with weak chains by Ahmad in his Musnad, al-Tabari in his Tafsir, al-Hakim in al-Mustadrak, al-Darimi in his Sunan (book of Riqaq), Abu al-Shaykh in al-Azama, and Ibn al-Mundhir. Ahmad and al-Hakims narrations begin with the words: Ummukuma fi al-nar Your mother [speaking to two brothers] is in the Fire while al-Darimis narration begins with the words: Dhâka yawmun yanzilu Allâhu taâlâ alâ kursiyyihi yaitu kama yaitu al-rahlu al-jadîdu min tadâyuqihi bih On that day, Allah shall descend on His Throne which shall groan the way a new saddle does, due to the pressure it will feel from Him.
Al-Darimis narration is highly questionable from another perspective, namely the anthropomorphism of the explicit attribution of the Thrones groaning to the pressure of Allah (swt) on it. It is known that all the narrations that mention this groaning of the Throne are also weak. They are narrated from five Companions:
- Abu Umama;
- Abu Musa al-Ashari;
- Umar ibn al-Khattab;
- Ibn Masud, as narrated by the hadith masters already mentioned;
- Jubayr ibn Mutam from his father from his grandfather.
All the above are narrated with weak or highly problematic chains as shown by Ibn al-Jawzi, al-Dhahabi, and the editors of al-Bayhaqis and Ibn Abi Asims books although Ibn Taymiyya typically tries to defend the authenticity of the narration of Umar which contains an explicit ascription of sitting to the Creator (swt). The hadith master Ibn Asakir wrote an entire monograph entitled Bayan al-Wahm wa al-Takhlit fi Hadith al-Atit (The Exposition of Error and Confusion in the Narration of the [Thrones] Groaning) as indicated by Ibn Kathir.
The narration of Abu Umama states that the Prophet (s) said: Ask Allah for al-Firdaws for it is the center of Paradise, and in it is heard the groaning of the Throne (atît al-arsh). Al-Hakim did not claim that it was sound (sahîh) and al-Dhahabi further stated that one of its sub-narrators, Jafar ibn al-Zubayr, was destroyed (hâlik) as a narrator; al-Tabaranis chain also contains him as stated by al-Haythami in Majma al-Zawaid, who called him fatally weak (matrûk).
The narration of Abu Musa al-Ashari states: The kursî is the footstool and it groans like a new saddle. Its chain is weak (daîf) as stated by the editor of al-Bayhaqis al-Asma wa al-Sifat. Even if it were sound, is not traced back to the Prophet (s) but would be a mawqûf narration halted at Abu Musa (r) furthermore it is cut up (munqati), as the Tâbiî who relates it, Umara ibn Umayr, did not meet Abu Musa al-Ashari. Finally, the scholars of hadith agree that none of the narrations that mention the groaning is authentic.
The narration of Umar states that a woman came to the Prophet (s) and said: Supplicate Allah so that He cause me to enter Paradise. The Prophet (s) then glorified Allah and said: Verily, His Seat of Authority (kursî) encompasses the heavens and the earth, and it groans like the sound of the new saddle when one mounts it, due to the weight pressing down on it. Al-Haythamis claim that its sub-narrators are all trustworthy is incorrect, as the sub-narrator Abd Allah ibn Khalifa is merely acceptable (maqbûl) according to Ibn Hajar, and Maruf and al-Arnaut consider him majhûl al-hâl, which further weakens the narration. This means that his narration is not retained except for the purpose of confirming an identical narration with a stronger chain. Furthermore, Ibn Kathir stated there is doubt whether he actually narrated from Umar and the hadith would then be narrated with a cut-up (munqati) chain.
As for the text of the hadith itself (matn), it is considered by Ibn Kathir in his Tafsir (1:31, 2:14) as a strange or one-chained (gharîb) narration. Ibn Kathir also states that Abu Dawuds narration from Jabir ibn Mutam is stranger yet.
The narration of Abu Dawud from Jubayr ibn Mutam, from his father, from his grandfather, states:
An Arab came to the Messenger of Allah (s) and said: O Messenger of Allah, people are in distress, the children are hungry, the crops are withered, and the animals are perishing, so Ask Allah to grant us rain, for we seek you as our intercessor with Allah, and Allah as our intercessor with you. The Prophet (s) said: Woe to you! Do you know what you are saying? Then the Prophet (s) glorified Allah and he went on until the effect of his speech showed on the faces of his Companions. He then said: Woe to you! Allah is not to be sought as intercessor with anyone. His state is greater than that. Woe to you! Do you know the greatness of Allah? Truly, His Throne (arsh) is on His Heavens like this and he formed with his fingers something like a dome over him and it groans on account of Him like a saddle groans because of its rider. Ibn Bashshar added in his version: Allah (swt) is above His Throne, and His Throne is above His Heavens.
The hadith is graded weak by the author of Awn al-Mabud. Al-Dhahabi terms it an extremely strange one-chained narration (gharîb jiddan) and says: Allah knows best if the Prophet (s) ever said such a thing or not; Allah (there is nothing whatsoever like unto Him) (42:11)! We have already mentioned Ibn Kathirs similar opinion of the hadith. As for its chain of narration, it is declared weak by the editors of Ibn Abi Asims al-Sunna and al-Ajurris al-Sharia. This is due to the concealment (tadlîs) of the mode of transmission through anana or undecisive transmission terminology by one of its narrators, Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Yasar al-Muttalibi while another narrator, Jubayr ibn Muhammad ibn Jubayr ibn Mutam, is merely acceptable (maqbûl), which makes him unreliable in a narration that is not independently verifiable. There are other problems with the chain and the text, which Ibn Asakir addresses in Bayan al-Wahm. Ibn al-Qayyim alone claimed that the least grading of this narration was hasan.
The hadith master Abu Sulayman al-Khattabi (d. 386) states in his commentary on Abu Dawud:
If this discourse is taken in its outward sense, then it suggests modality (kayfiyya), which does not apply to Allah and His Attributes. It is therefore understood that the import of the hadith is not to attribute modality to Him or suggest boundaries to Him in this manner. Rather, it consists in a metaphor (kalâm taqrîb) to give an idea of the greatness of Allah and make understandable to the questioner what is beyond his level of understanding, for he was an uneducated Bedouin unversed in the minutiae of language and the sutbleties of speech which elude the mind. In this discourse, we find ellipsis and allusiveness. Thus the meaning of his saying: Do you know what Allah is? means: Do you know the greatness of Allah? and his saying: It groans under him means that it is unable to carry His Majesty and Greatness. Thus it groans under him for it is known that the reason a camel saddle groans under the rider is because of the weight of what is on it and its inability to carry it. By drawing this kind of similitude he illustrates the meaning of the Greatness and Might of Allah and the height of His Throne in order for it to be known that the holder of lofty rank, mighty status, and exalted name, is not to be made an intercessor with one who is lesser in position and below Him in degree.
A similar mode of interpretation was adopted by later scholars. Ibn al-Athir (d. 630) in his Nihaya fi Gharîb al-Hadith under the entry a-t-t said: There is no actual groaning, it is only a metaphorical expression in order to confirm Divine magnificence (wa in lam yakun thamma atît wa innamâ huwa kalâmu taqrîb urîda bihi taqrîru azamat Allâh taâlâ). Ibn al-Jawzi (d. 597) stated something identical in his Daf Shubah al-Tashbih:
The meaning of the groaning of the kursî is its impotence before the majesty and greatness of Allah, as it is known that the groaning of the camel saddle under its rider is a indication of the power of what sits on top of it, or its impotence to bear it. The Prophet (s) drew this kind of simile for Divine greatness and majesty in order to teach the Arab who had sought the intercession of Allah (swt) with the Prophet (s) that the One whose greatness is overwhelming is not to be sought as an intercessor with those under His station. As for al-Qadi Abu Yalas words: The groaning is because of the pressure of the Essence of Allah on it this is overt anthropomorphism.
Al-Dhahabi eludes the issue by stating that the groaning of the Throne is unrelated to the Divine Names and Attributes but would be similar to the shaking of the Throne at the death of Sad ibn Muadh (as narrated by al-Bukhari and Muslim) and the cleaving of the heaven on the Day of Resurrection.
Al-Suyuti mentioned Abu Musa al-Asharis narration in al-Durr al-Manthur and said: This is a metaphor (hâdha alâ sabîl al-istiâra). This [metaphorical] meaning is made clear by Ibn Jarirs narration from al-Dahhak whereby The kursî is placed below the Throne and is where the angels stand.
Al-Suyutis elucidation is confirmed by what al-Qurtubi quoted from Ibn Atiyya in his Tafsir of the Verse of the Throne whereby the meaning was that the kursî was placed in front of the arsh just like the footstool is placed in front of a high chair, indicating that it did not necessitate reference to an actual footstool but referred, for example, to a seat or station. Al-Bayhaqi states the same.
It is evident that the authorities considered the narrations of the groaning of the Throne as weak and their texts as strange and one-chained in their transmission. They held that even if such narrations were to be accepted, nevertheless their meaning would be understood as metaphorical in order to preclude anthropomorphism. The meaning of the Thrones groaning would then be its impotence before Divine Majesty and Greatness or its submission to its Creator.
A further problem of some of these narrations, such as those cited in al-Ilal al-Mutanahiya by Ibn al-Jawzi from his shaykh Ibn al-Zaghuni, is their mention that Allah (swt) sits on the kursî so that only four spans of it remain vacant (ma yafdalu minhu illâ qadaru arbai asâbi). This is a commonplace of anthropomorphism. The earliest compiler of Ahmad ibn Hanbals jurisprudence, al-Khallal, in his book al-Sunna, after stating that Allah (swt) sits on the kursî and there remains only four spans vacant, goes on to narrate over a hundred pages of weak and forged reports to that effect, finally claiming that whoever denies Mujahids report is a follower of Jahm ibn Safwan! This is an extremely grave charge in view of the status of Jahmis as apostates in the eyes of Imam Ahmad and his school.
2. An Unverified Narration From Ibn Umar
Ibn Umar related that the Prophet (s) recited: It may be that your Lord shall raise you to an Exalted Station and that [it meant] Allah would seat him on the dais (yujlisuhu alâ al-sarîr).
It is narrated by Ibn Marduyah in his Tafsir as stated by al-Suyuti in his commentary on the verse in al-Durr al-Manthur. The authenticity of this narration is not known and its wording departs from all the other narrations, though not its meaning.
3. Another Unverified Narration From Ibn Umar
The same as above is also narrated from Ibn Umar, but with the wording: Allah shall seat me with Him on the Throne (al-sarîr).
Al-Suyuti cited it in al-Durr al-Manthur and said: Narrated by al-Daylami. The authenticity of this narration is not known, and Daylami (d. 509) did not give his chain when citing the hadith. In such cases the rule is to consider the narration weak, as stated by al-Suyuti in his introduction to Jam al-Jawami, also known as al-Jami al-Kabir, as quoted by Muttaqi al-Hindi at the opening of Kanz al-Ummal:
Everything that I reference to these four [al-Uqayli in al-Duafa, Ibn Adi in al-Kamil fi al-Duafa, al-Khatib al-Baghdadi, and Ibn Asakir], or to al-Hakim al-Tirmidhi in Nawadir al-Usul, or to al-Hakim in his Tarikh, or to al-Daylami in Musnad al-Firdaws: all that is weak (fa huwa daîf), and it is therefore unnecessary, when referencing a narration back to one of them, to state explicitly that that narration is weak.
4. A Narration From Ibn Abbas
From Ibn Abbas: [The meaning of] the verse [of the Exalted Station] is that Allah shall seat the Prophet (s) between Him and Gibrîl (as), and he will intercede for his Community. That is the Praiseworthy Station.
Al-Suyuti cited it in al-Durr al-Manthur and said: Narrated by al-Tabarani. Al-Haythami said in Majma al-Zawaid (book of Tafsir on Surat al-Isra): Al-Tabarani narrated it with a chain containing Ibn Lahia who is weak if no-one else narrated the same hadith at his level of the chain (idhâ lam yutâba). As for [one of its sub-narrators, the Tâbiî] Ata ibn Dinar (d. 126), it is said he did not actually hear narrations from [the next link in the chain, the Tâbiî] Said ibn Jubayr (d. 94). Ibn Hajar specifies that Atas narrations from Said are from reading rather than hearing. The chain of this hadith would then be weak and cut-up (daîf munqati) as confirmed by Maruf and al-Arnauts comments.
5. Mujahids Controverted Narration
From Mujahid: The saying of Allah: [It may be that your Lord will raise you to an Exalted Station] (17:79) means: He will seat the Prophet (s) with Him on His Throne (yujlisuhu maahu alâ arshihi).
Al-Dhahabi cited the above in his notice on Mujahid with dismay: One of the most reprehensible matters that came from Mujahid in his commentary of the Quran is what he said concerning the verse [It may be that thy Lord will raise you to an Exalted Station] he said: He will seat the Prophet (s) with Him on the Throne (wa min ankari mâ jâa an mujâhidin fî al-tafsîri fî qawlihi asâ an yabathaka rabbuka maqâman mahmûdan qâla: yujlisuhu maahu alâ al-arsh!).
Ibn Abi Asim (d. 287) narrated Mujahids hadith in his book al-Sunna, edited by M. Nasir al-Albani who said: Its chain is weak and severed (maqtû). This chain is as follows: Ibn Abi Asim said: < Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shayba narrated to us: < Ibn Fudayl narrated to us, < From Layth, < From Mujahid.
Al-Suyuti also cited Mujahids report in al-Durr al-Manthur and said that it was narrated by Ibn Jarir al-Tabari. We cite al-Tabaris narration and his commentary further below.
6. A Narration From Aisha
Ibn al-Jawzi in the thirthy-ninth hadith of his Daf Shubah al-Tashbih mentions that Aisha asked the Prophet (s) about the Exalted Station and he replied: My Lord promised to seat me on the Throne. Ibn al-Jawzi said: This narration is not authentic from the Prophet (s).
Ibn Abi Asim said:
Muhammad ibn Abi Safwan al-Thaqafi narrated to us:
Yahya ibn Kathir Abu Ghassan al-Anbari narrated to us:
Salm ibn Jafar narrated to us:
From [Abu Masud] Said al-Jariri who said:
Sayf al-Sadusi narrated to us:
From Abd Allah ibn Salam who said: On the Day of Resurrection your Prophet shall be brought and he shall be made to sit in front of Allah the Almighty, on His Throne (yuqadu bayna yaday Allâhi alâ kursiyyihi). One of the sub-narrators, Salm ibn Jafar, said to the one previous to him in the chain of transmission, Abu Masud al-Jariri: If he is on His kursî, then, surely, he is with Him [rather than in front of Him]? (idhâ kâna alâ kursiyyihi fa huwa maahu?). Abu Masud replied: Woe to you all! This is the dearest of all hadiths in my sight.
The narration reports Salm ibn Jafars distinction between the terms in front of Allah and on His Throne which seems to presuppose that Allah (swt) is on the Throne in the anthropomorphist sense. To Salm, the Prophet (s) is either in front of Allah or on His Throne, but he cannot be both at the same time. Abu Masuds curt reply shows that Salm was not alone in observing this. However, there is no discrepancy, as the Prophet (s) can be both on the Throne of Allah (swt) and in front of Him at one and the same time; Salm ibn Jafars premise is far from necessary, hence Abu Masuds displeasure. The apparent confusion is lifted even further if one remembers that kursî in the narrations either means the Throne, or another throne next to it, or the Footstool or Station which is in front of the Throne. An example of the first meaning is al-Darimis narration mentioned in Section 1; an example of the second, al-Hakims authentic narration in Section 7; an example of the third, the narration of Ibn Abbas: The kursî is the footstool.
8. Another Narration From Abd Allah ibn Salam
From Abd Allahbn Salam, in a long hadith on the Day of Judgment: A seat (kursî) will be placed for the Prophet (s) on the right of Allah (swt). This narration from the same Companion as the previous one is therefore clearer with respect to meaning and more reliable with respect to transmission. Both this and the previous narration, although stopped at a Companion (mawqûf), would normally have the status of narrations traced back to the Prophet (s) (marfû) since they give depictions of the unseen which are not subject to a Companions opinion but necessarily come from him as a transmitted report. Yet the hadith scholars have drawn attention to Abd Allahbn Salam as one of the Companions who frequently report narrations from the People of the Book (isrâîliyyât). Because of this, they have refrained from giving his mawqûf reports and those of Abd Allah ibn Amr ibn al-As the status of marfû unless independently confirmed. Similar caution applies to the Successors Kab al-Ahbar and Wahb ibn Munabbih.
These narrations bring to three the reported positions of the Prophet (s) in the different versions of the hadith of the seating: On the Throne, in front of the Throne, and to the right of the Throne. The first is itself divided into two versions: alone, or with Allah. The latter is obviously the most controverted version.
Imam al-Tabari said in his Tafsir:
Others said [concerning the verse of the Exalted Station]: Rather [than meaning Intercession], that Praiseworthy Station to which Allah has promised to raise His Prophet is the fact that He shall seat him with Him on His Throne!
Following is the mention of those who said this:
Abbad ibn Yaqub al-Asadi  said to us:
Ibn Fudayl  said to us:
From Layth: 
Concerning the saying of Allah: [It may be that you Lord will raise you to an Exalted Station] He shall make him sit with Him on His Throne (yujlisuhu maahu alâ arshihi).
But of the two explanations concerning this question the likelier to be correct is that supported by the authentic report from the Prophet (s) such as the following from Abu Hurayra:
Abu Kurayb said to us:
Waki said to us:
From Dawud ibn Yazid:
From his father [Yazid ibn Abd al-Rahman]:
From Abu Hurayra:
The Prophet (s) was asked about the verse: It may be that thy Lord will raise you to an Exalted Station and he said: That is intercession (hiya al-shafâa).
Al-Tabari then goes on to mention nine more narrations supporting the latter interpretation of the verse. However, far from rejecting Mujahids narration, he returns to discuss it and defends its authenticity:
Even if [the meaning of Intercession] is the sound position (al-sahîh min al-qawl) in the interpretation [of the Exalted Station] due to what we mentioned from the Prophet (s), the Companions, and the Successors nevertheless, what Mujahid said to the effect that Allah shall seat Muhammad (s) on His Throne is a position that is by no means unsound whether from the perspective of narration or from that of reason. For there is no report from the Prophet (s) nor from any of the Companions nor Successors precluding it. As for the perspective of reason, those who profess (yantahil) Islam differ on its meaning in only three ways:
. One group said: Allah (swt) is separate (bâin) from His creation. He was before He created things; then He created them without entering into contact with them; and He is exactly as He ever was. However, with regard to the things He created, since He is not in contact (mumâss) with them, it is obligatory that He be separate from them. For there is no effecter (faâl) upon things but he is either in contact with them or separate from them.
According to that group, since Allah (swt)s the effecter of things, and since they say that it is impermissible to describe Him as being in contact with them, it is therefore incumbent so they claim that He be separate from them. According to their school, it follows that it is the same whether He seats Muhammad (s) on His Throne or on the ground. For it results from their position that His separateness (baynûna) from His Throne and separateness from the ground are one and the same in meaning: He is equally separate from both, equally in contact with neither.
· Another group said: Allah Almighty was, before He created things, in contact with nothing and separate from nothing. Then He created things and brought them into existence through His power, remaining exactly as He ever was before He created things, in contact with nothing, separate (bâin) from nothing.
According to that groups position also, it is equally the
same whether He seats Muhammad (s) on His Throne or on His
· A third group said: Allah Almighty was, before He created things, in contact with nothing and separate from nothing. Then He brought things into being and created them. At that time He created for Himself a Throne over which He established Himself by sitting (istawâ alayhi jâlisan), and He entered into contact with it (sâra lahu mumâssan). This is just as, before He created things, there was nothing to which He granted sustenance and nothing of which He deprived it; then He created things and gave this one sustenance and deprived that one of it, giving to this one and withholding from that one. Similarly He was, before creating things, in contact with nothing and separate from nothing, then He created things and became in contact with the Throne by sitting on it as opposed to the remainder of creation. Therefore, He is in contact with whatever He wishes from His creation, and He is separate from whatever He wishes from His creation.
According to the school of that group also, it is the same whether He seats Muhammad (s) on His Throne or on a pulpit of light, for they also say that the Lords sitting on the Throne does not occupy the entirety of the Throne; and [they say], similarly, that the seating of Muhammad (s) does not necessitate for him the attribute of lordship, nor does it bring him out of that of servanthood; just as the separateness of Muhammad (s) from whatever is separate from him, neither necessitates lordship for him nor brings him out of servanthood on the sole grounds that he is separate from it. According to that line of thinking, just as Allah (swt) is described as separate from things, similarly, the Prophet (s) is described as separate from the Throne. They arrive at the conclusion that since the meaning of being separate does not necessarily preclude from the Prophet (s) the attribute of servanthood nor impose lordship upon him, similarly, his seating on the Throne of the Merciful does not necessitate either of the above for him.
In conclusion, it is clear that, as we said before, what Mujahid said is not impossible, according to all those who profess Islam, namely: that Allah (swt) shall seat the Prophet (s) on His Throne.
Now if someone should say: We do not deny the seating of the Prophet (s) by Allah (swt) on His Throne [since it is related] from Abd Allah ibn Salam: Verily, on the Day of Resurrection, Muhammad (s) shall be on the Lords Throne (kursî al-Rabb), in front of the Lord (bayna yaday al-Rabb). All that we deny is that He seat him with Him. We can reply to him: Do you allow that He seats him on it but not with Him? If he allows that, then he also concurs that either he is with Him [on the Throne], or that He seats him while being separate from [the Throne], or not in contact with it, or neither in contact nor separate. Whichever of these alternatives he concedes he will have accepted part of what he previously denied. But if he disallows it then he will be diverging from all the different groups whose positions we mentioned, and that is a divergence from all those that profess Islam; for there is no other position than the three we have cited none of them considering what Mujahid said to be impossible.
Al-Tabaris view that both interpretations stand is confirmed by Mujahid himself, from whom is also reported the exegesis narrated by Abu Hurayra, as found in Tafsir Mujahid:
Abd al-Rahman [ibn al-Hasan al-Hamadhani] told us:
Ibrahim [ibn al-Husayn al-Hamadhani] narrated to us:
Adam [ibn Abi Iyas] narrated to us:
Warqa [ibn Umar] narrated to us,
From [Abd Allah] Ibn Abi Najih,
[Concerning the verse] It may be that your Lord shall raise you to an Exalted Station Mujahid said: The Exalted Station is the intercession of Muhammad (s).
9a. Another Position Related from al-Tabari
An incident was related to have taken place between al-Tabari and some Hanbalis in Baghdad over the explanation of the verse of the Exalted Station whereby al-Tabari reportedly recited:
subhana man laysa lahu anisun wa ma lahu fi arshihi jalisu
Glory to Him Who has no comrade nor companion sitting with Him on His Throne!
Hearing this, the account goes, the irate Hanbalis pelted al-Tabari with their inkwells and he sought shelter in his house. The report seems dubious in light of the above-cited defense by al-Tabari, in his Tafsir, of Mujahids narration Furthermore, al-Suyutis report is not found anywhere else. What is well-established is that the Hanbalis persecuted al-Tabari for failing to mention Imam Ahmad in his book Ikhtilaf al-Fuqaha. Another reason mentioned by al-Dhahabi, was the antagonism between al-Tabari and the Hanbali Abu Bakr ibn Abi Dawud, who falsely accused him of being a Râfidî.
10. Al-Qurtubis Commentary
Imam al-Qurtubi commented thus on the verse of the Exalted Station in his Tafsir:
The third explanation of this verse is what al-Tabari reported from a party of scholars among them Mujahid whereby the Exalted Station is the seating by Allah (swt) of the Prophet (s) with Him on His Throne (kursiyyih). They narrated a hadith to that effect, and al-Tabari backed up the possibility (jawâz) of such a thing with some extravagant statements (shatatin min al-qawl). However, what he said cannot be inferred [from the verse] except with over-subtlety as to meaning (al-talattuf bi al-manâ), and it is far-fetched (fîhi bud). This is not to say that there is no such narration; only that [one endowed with] knowledge interprets it figuratively (al-ilmu yataawwaluhu).
Abu Said al-Naqqash mentioned from Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Whoever denies this hadith, we strongly condemn him. The scholars of knowledge never stopped narrating this hadith. Who among them ever denied its possibility, even as he interpreted it?
Abu Umar [Ibn Abd al-Barr] said: Concerning Mujahid although he is one of the major scholars, nevertheless he interprets away the Quran. There are two sayings of his which the people of knowledge have strongly rejected: one of them is this saying; the other is his interpretation of the verses: (On that day will faces be resplendent, looking towards their Lord) (75:22-23) as meaning: waiting for their reward, not actually looking. He [Abu Umar] mentioned that in his chapter on Ibn Shihab in the discussion of the hadith of descent (nuzûl).
Also narrated from Mujahid in explanation of the verse [of the Exalted Station] is his saying: Allah will seat him on the Throne (yujlisuhu alâ al-arsh). This is not an impossible interpretation. For Allah (swt) existed and was Self-Sufficient (qâim bi dhâtihi) before He created any object, including the Throne. Then He created objects, not out of need for them, but to show His power and wisdom, and in order that His existence be known as well as His Oneness, absolute might, and all-encompassing knowledge in all the acts He decrees. [Among these objects] He created for Himself a Throne over which He elevated Himself in the way that He wished, without contact with the Throne (min ghayri an sâra lahu mumâssan) and without the Throne becoming a place (makân) for Him. In this respect it is also said: He is now exactly as He was before He created place and time.
On that basis it is the same, with respect to possibility,
whether Allah seats the Prophet (s) on the Throne or on the
As for the term with Him used in Mujahids
[first] report, it is in the same
category as the saying of Allah:
11. Al-Asharis Dismissal
Imam Al-Ashari stated the following in the chapter on anthropomorphists (al-Mujassima) in his book Maqalat al-Islamiyyin: Some of those who profess (yantahil) the science of hadith said: The Throne is not filled by Allah, because He makes His Prophet sit with him on the Throne.
The word profess constitutes a tacit dismissal of
those who used Mujahids narration to support the concept of
the physical togetherness (maiyya) of the Prophet
(s) with Allah (swt) on the Throne, particularly those in the